Scrolling through a library of thumbnails should be as smooth as silk.
![thumbsplus 10 database settings thumbsplus 10 database settings](https://windows-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/ThumbsPlus_19.png)
Why don’t I like it? Let me count the ways: It’s clearly meant as Adobe’s Photoshop Album on steroids – but instead they have created a Frankenstein’s monster. And they have no excuse, it’s not as though this has been their first foray into this area. Adobe should be ashamed of themselves for releasing this on to the market. I find it an appalling and clunky piece of software.
![thumbsplus 10 database settings thumbsplus 10 database settings](https://www.digitalcitizen.life/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/win10_settings_8-1.png)
But I actively hate the Organizer with a passion. First, the good thing: the editor in Photoshop Elements is excellent, so for manipulating your digital images, it is likely to have all the power that most people are looking for. So, close – but no cigar.Īnd then we come to Adobe’s Organizer. In addition, it does not yet support XMP metadata at all. While this can be done, it’s not very convenient, and it means that right from the word go, I’m having to delve into an application instead of concentrate on the task at hand. However, if you want to search on other IPTC metadata, then you need to define your own user fields in the ThumbsPlus database, and set up mapping between these and IPTC fields. It is possible to set up synchronisation of these internal keywords and IPTC keywords. In addition, although it can read and write IPTC metadata, it does not use IPTC keywords by default, but stores user keywords in its own database. It’s as though I can no longer see the wood for the trees. The reasons are that the program has “grown like Topsy” over the years, and now it has so many bells and whistles that I have no use for. Now, I quite like ThumbsPlus – it’s fast and flexible, but on balance I don’t think it’s for me.
#THUMBSPLUS 10 DATABASE SETTINGS WINDOWS#
I’ve actually been using ThumbsPlus 5 for years – since the days of Windows 95, when image handling by the operating system was in its infancy, and needed a boost from applications such as ThumbsPlus. Next up is ThumbsPlus 7 from Cerious Software. Instead it stores keyword metadata only in its own database.
![thumbsplus 10 database settings thumbsplus 10 database settings](https://winaero.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Windows-10-fix-search-does-not-work-in-Settings.png)
Yes, it can read and write EXIF metadata, but does not handle either IPTC or XMP. So, with that groundrule in mind, I can instantly reject consideration of ACDSee 7. That way lies painting oneself into a corner down the road… However, I will accept an organiser that copies metadata from image files into its own database for performance reasons, so long as the database and the image files metadata content are kept in sync transparently (i.e.
#THUMBSPLUS 10 DATABASE SETTINGS SOFTWARE#
I am not interested in any image metadata being stored away in a proprietary format in the organising software itself. This time I’ll write about ACDSee7, ThumbsPlus 7 and Adobe’s Organizer (included as part of Photoshop Elements).įirst, let me state a groundrule that I have adopted: I insist that any organising software will respect any EXIF, IPTC and XMP metadata that may be stored in the image file itself. I’ve been taking a look at some other software applications for organising libraries of photos.